We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label hears. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label hears. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 04 Oktober 2011

Cancer kills Nobel physician before he hears of prize

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Nobel prize for medicine winner Canadian-born Ralph Steinman. REUTERS/Zach Veilleux/Rockefeller University

Nobel prize for medicine winner Canadian-born Ralph Steinman.

Credit: Reuters/Zach Veilleux/Rockefeller University

By Patrick Lannin and Mia Shanley

STOCKHOLM | Mon Oct 3, 2011 4:16pm EDT

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - A scientist who won the Nobel prize for medicine on Monday used his own discoveries to treat himself for cancer, but died of the disease just days before he could be told of the award.

Calling it "bittersweet" news, colleagues of Canadian-born Ralph Steinman at New York's Rockefeller University said he had prolonged his own life with a new therapy based on his prize-winning research into the body's immune system.

The 68-year-old physician, who joked last week with his family about hanging on until the annual prize announcement, died on Friday after a four-year battle with pancreatic cancer.

He never knew his life's work was crowned with the highest accolade science can bestow, becoming the first man in half a century to win a posthumous Nobel prize after a day of confusion in Stockholm, where the Nobel Committee rules have long insisted, in principle, on recognizing only living laureates.

"We wanted him to be here for this," said his daughter Alexis Steinman, 34. "We were like 'OK Dad, I know things aren't going well but the Nobel, they are going to announce it next Monday'. And he's like: 'I know I have got to hold out for that. They don't give it to you if you have passed away.

"'I got to hold out for that.'"

The Nobel Committee spent the morning calling Steinman to offer the traditional congratulations before discovering they faced a "unique" situation. Hours of urgent talks with lawyers on the fate of the prize money, worth three quarters of a million U.S. dollars, finally saw them decide to hand it to Steinman's heirs.

Two other pioneers whose work on the immune system has also driven ground-breaking possibilities for curbing infections and cancers, American Bruce Beutler and Jules Hoffman from France, shared the other half of the 10 million-crown prize.

"It's really impossible to describe how our family is feeling right now. We're devastated to have lost Ralph," Steinman's son Adam told reporters in New York. "We're so incredibly proud of dad for receiving this wonderful honor ... We know he will live on through his scientific contributions."

Steinman's research contributed to the launch last year of the first vaccine designed to kill tumors.

"BITTERSWEET NEWS"

Colleagues said he was working until his final days.

Admitted to hospital last Sunday, he lost consciousness on Thursday and died surrounded by family the following day. But Rockefeller University president Marc Tessier-Lavigne said the university only heard of his death from the family about half an hour after news of the Nobel prize came out from Sweden.

Nobel Committee secretary general Goran Hansson told Reuters: "I am, of course, saddened that Dr Steinman could not receive this news and feel that happiness.

"He was a great scientist."

After examining a rule which bars giving the prize to the dead, and a second which says a laureate nonetheless keeps the prize if they die between the announcement and the award ceremony held some weeks later, the committee said it found the latter rule to be more fitting to Steinman's case.

"The Nobel Prize shall not deliberately be awarded posthumously. However, the decision to award the Nobel Prize to Ralph Steinman was made in good faith, based on the assumption that the Nobel laureate was alive," the committee said.

His university said: "Steinman ... was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer four years ago, and his life was extended using a dendritic-cell based immunotherapy of his own design."

Those cells, which the Montreal-born Steinman discovered in the 1970s, are vital to the attack the body launches on tumors and infections if they breach its first line of immune defense.

The other prizewinners, Beutler and Hoffmann, studied the first stages of the body's immune responses in the 1990s.

Lars Klareskog, who chairs the Nobel prize panel, said: "I am very excited about what these discoveries mean.

"We will have new, better vaccines against microbes and that is very much needed now with the increased resistance against antibiotics."

Beutler, 53, is based at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California. Luxembourg-born Hoffmann, 70, conducted much of his work in Strasbourg.

SELF-Defense

The work of all three prizewinners has been pivotal to the development of improved types of vaccines against infectious diseases and novel approaches to fighting cancer. The research has helped lay the foundations for a new wave of "therapeutic vaccines" that stimulate the immune system to attack tumors.

Better understanding of the complexities of the immune system has also given clues to treating inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, in which the body's defense system ends up attacking its own tissues.

Beutler told Reuters his work "might lead to new treatments for inflammatory and auto-immune disease and possibly new treatments for other kinds of diseases as well."

In the United States, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society said the trio's work "formed the foundation of immunotherapy which holds great promise for the cancer community."

Beutler and Hoffmann discovered in the 1990s that receptor proteins act as a first line of defense, innate immunity, by recognizing bacteria and other microorganisms. Steinman's work, explained how, if required, dendritic cells in the next phase, adaptive immunity, kill off infections that break through.

The research ultimately led to the launch of the first therapeutic cancer vaccine last year, Dendreon's Provenge, which treats men with advanced prostate cancer.

It was unclear how Steinman had treated his own pancreatic cancer -- a notoriously deadly form of the disease. The development of treatments from research can take many years. Former student Michel Nussenzweig said Steinman's discovery was only now reaching that stage after a particular wait.

"No one believed it for a really long time," Nussenzweig said of the work on cells. "His dream was to use his discovery to develop vaccines and it's a dream that's pretty close."

Medicine is usually the first of the Nobel prizes awarded each year. They were first awarded in 1901 using a bequest from dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel.

The only previous posthumous awards were to Swedes: poet Erik Axel Karlfeldt, for literature, in 1931; and U.N. chief Dag Hammarskjold, given the 1961 peace prize weeks after dying in a plane crash while on a peacemaking mission in Africa.

(Additional reporting by Ben Hirschler in London, Michelle Nichols in New York and Anna Ringstrom in Stockholm; writing by Alastair Macdonald; editing by Andrew Roche)



New Automobile



Health Management

Selasa, 27 September 2011

Court hears child heart unit row

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
27 September 2011 Last updated at 09:49 GMT Royal Brompton The hospital has described the consultation as unlawful The Royal Brompton Hospital is starting a legal challenge over what it says was "deeply flawed" consultation which it claims has led to its children's heart surgery unit facing closure.

It says the shutting down of the unit would put the viability of the whole hospital at risk.

The hospital in Chelsea, west London, has the largest specialist heart and lung centre in the UK.

A judicial review over the consultation begins later at the High Court.

Its challenge, which is expected to be heard over three days, is against the consultation process launched by the Joint Committee of the Primary Care Trusts of England as part of a national review aimed at streamlining paediatric congenital cardiac surgery services (PCCS) around the country.

It is believed this is the first legal challenge of its kind to be brought by one NHS body against another.

Continue reading the main story
Our decision to take legal action has been taken with deep regret”

End Quote Bob Bell Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust Bob Bell, the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust's chief executive, said: "Our decision to take legal action has been taken with deep regret.

"But the gravity of the consequences for patients of this deeply flawed consultation process left us no other option."

The decision to grant a judicial review was made following a hearing in July.

At that hearing, Alan Maclean QC, for the trust, said the joint committee was proposing under the "Safe and Sustainable" consultation on the future of children's heart surgery in England to reduce the number of centres in London from three to two.

Robust review

He said it was now clear that the Royal Brompton centre was going to be "ditched" following an "unfair and unlawful" consultation exercise "shot through with legal error".

But Neil Garnham QC, for the joint committee, said there had not yet been a final decision that the number of PCCS centres in London would be reduced from three to two.

The three-centre solution "has plainly not been excluded and the joint committee is proceeding with an open mind", said Mr Garnham.

Views in favour of retaining the Royal Brompton's services would be properly considered.

Teresa Moss, director of the NHS' Specialised Commissioning team, said: "Safe and Sustainable do not accept the allegations made today by the Royal Brompton.

"We will present our own case later this week when we provide evidence in court demonstrating that the principles and processes of the review are robust."



View the original article here



Peliculas Online