We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Change. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Change. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 04 Desember 2011

How Playing Violent Video Games May Change the Brain

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Research finds that children who play violent video games or watch violent TV can become violent themselves, but what drives this change? Are they kids simply mimicking what they see on the screen, or could gaming have a more profound effect on their brains, affecting behavior?

To explore that question, Dr. Vincent Matthews and his colleagues at Indiana University, who have long studied media violence, looked at what happened in the brain in 28 students who were randomly assigned to play either a violent, first-person shooter game or a non-violent one every day for a week. None of the participants had much previous gaming experience.

At the start of the study, researchers used functional MRI to scan brain activity in the participants, all young adult men, while they completed lab-based tasks involving either emotional or non-emotional content. The participants were then scanned again while they repeated the same tasks, after a week of playing the video games.

Researchers found that those who played the violent video games showed less activity in areas that involved emotions, attention and inhibition of our impulses. "Behavioral studies have shown an increase in aggressive behavior after violent video games, and what we show is the physiological explanation for what the behavioral studies are showing," says Matthews. "We're showing that there are changes in brain function that are likely related to that behavior."

It's not clear how long-lasting the changes may be. When Matthews brought the participants back after a week of not playing video games, their brain activity had changed again, reverting to more normal reactions, but their brain functions still weren't quite the same as before they were exposed to the violent games.

One task the participants completed while being scanned assessed their response to violent versus non-violent words. The participants were presented with violent words such as hit, harm and kill and non-violent words like run, walk and talk, each in different colors. Participants were asked to identify the color of each word, rather than the word itself, a variation of a common psychological test known as the Stroop effect: normally, there is a delay in identifying the color, since we tend to process the meaning of the word we read first, before noting the color of the letters.

Researchers found that those who played the non-violent video games showed the normal delay, but also showed increases in activity in the emotional parts of the brain when faced with the violent words. The violent-game players, meanwhile, showed similar brain activity in the baseline tests, but after a week of playing violent games, they revealed significantly less activation of their emotional brain centers.

Another task designed to test participants' attention and concentration showed declines in the violent-game group after a week of play. The men were presented with a numeral — 1, 2 or 3 — repeated various numbers of times, and were asked to press a button indicating not the numeral itself, but how many times it appeared. The violent-game players showed decreased activity in the parts of the brain that regulate attention and concentration.

The brain changes don't appear to be permanent, but documenting that the brain does change in response to playing a violent game — even just for two hours a day for a week — is a significant advance in understanding how young players may be affected by these games. The brain changes that Matthews' group saw were similar to those seen in teens with destructive sociopathic disorders, and his results, along with those from previous studies showing shorter-term effects, have been used in court cases by parents and others hoping to limit violent game play among young children. "Individuals and parents of children who choose to play games need to be aware that there are changes in brain function and they need to consider that when they decide whether or not to play these games," says Matthews.

Alice Park is a writer at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @aliceparkny. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Sabtu, 29 Oktober 2011

Scientists Say Texas Agency Edits Out Climate Change

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Scientists and conservationists accuse the state environmental agency of editing references to climate change and sea level rise out of a public report — because the agency, like Gov. Rick Perry, is skeptical of global warming.

Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

RENEE MONTAGNE, host: The Texas coast has also battled its share of dangerous floodwaters. Now a controversy over alleged scientific censorship is roiling Galveston Bay. It involves the administration of Texas Governor and presidential candidate Rick Perry.

ARI SHAPIRO, host: Scientists and conservationists accuse the state environmental agency of editing references to climate change and sea level rise out of a public report because the agency and the governor remain staunch global warming skeptics. NPR's John Burnett reports.

JOHN BURNETT: Galveston Bay is a large estuary on the upper Texas coast whose deteriorating health is of great concern to stakeholders, from fishermen to boaters to birders. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the TCEQ, commissioned a scientific report called State of the Bay, but it wasn't happy with some of the results. The report's authors are in agreement that sea-level rise caused by global warming is threatening wetlands surrounding Galveston Bay, but the TCEQ did not want any mention of human-caused environmental calamities and pulled out its red pencil.

L'OREAL STEPNEY: Let's call the meeting to order. I'll guess I'll do my official gavel thing.

BURNETT: And that's what brought issue before 50 people Wednesday morning inside a meeting room in a mosquito-infested marsh a few miles from the troubled bay. L'Oreal Stepney is deputy director of the Office of Water at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

STEPNEY: Let me say this clearly. We are not an agency that is about censorship. It is not what we do, it is wrong, it is not who we are.

BURNETT: Stepney played down the firestorm as merely professional differences between her agency and the report's authors. But the scientist who wrote the offending chapter claims what happened is nothing less than the muzzling of an inconvenient truth.

JOHN ANDERSON: One of the most striking edits that was made was the deletion of a figure that was taken from Science magazine that showed the measured rate of sea level rise over the long term in historical time, and the predicted rate of rise, and again, that was taken from Science magazine, one of the most credible journals on Earth.

BURNETT: The author is John Anderson, a ruddy-faced 67-year-old oceanographer from Rice University, who among other things has spent 26 seasons studying ice sheet changes in Antarctica, and its effect on global sea level rise. He says the agency deleted passages that Galveston Bay is currently rising three millimeters a year, a six-fold increase, and that human-induced global warming is the cause.

ANDERSON: And I think the travesty here is that this chapter was actually written for teachers. They're my target audience, and this to me is just an outward attempt to keep scientific information, scientific fact, from getting into classrooms.

BURNETT: The agency also deleted a reference that manmade dams on rivers have disrupted important sediment deposition into the bay. L'Oreal Stepney said in an interview that the report should focus on the overall health of the bay and avoid controversial theories. She said the TCEQ is not ignoring the reality of sea-level rise - it's mentioned elsewhere in the report - it's only Anderson's chapter linking it to global warming that they object to.

STEPNEY: It's unsettled science, in our opinion, and that's our position, and we've been clear about that.

BURNETT: At the meeting, the TCEQ offered a compromise - the agency would publish "State of the Bay" without Anderson's chapter and dissident scientists could publish the unedited chapter on their own. But that didn't placate the Galveston Bay Council that held the meeting. One after another members spoke up. The chair of the council said they wanted the state to publish the complete report unexpurgated. A representative from the EPA, which helped fund the study, echoed her comment. Then concerned citizen Albert Gonzalez spoke his mind.

ALBERT GONZALEZ. TEXAS: The political climate in our nation right now seems to be anti-regulation, anti-science. That just is very, very upsetting, and I just wanted to make that comment.

BURNETT: The world's leading science academies state that most of the global warming in recent decades is likely the result of human activities. Rick Perry, his commissioners on the TCEQ, and some members of Congress, mostly Republicans, say that human-caused climate change is junk science. The governor's office said he would have no comment on the Galveston Bay censorship controversy, which has yet to be resolved. John Burnett, NPR News, Houston.

Copyright © 2011 National Public Radio®. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to National Public Radio. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.



Health Management



Education Information

Selasa, 25 Oktober 2011

Argue Much? Conflict Levels in Marriage Don't Change Over Time

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

If you squabble a lot with your sweetie, don't think that things will improve after getting hitched. New research shows that conflict levels don't vary much over the course of marriage. (The good news, conversely, is that if you get along well, you're likely to continue along that same trajectory.)

The new research by Ohio State University researchers also showed that satisfied marriages can take many forms. Just because a relationship isn't tranquil doesn't mean it's unhappy. Likewise, a marriage devoid of fighting doesn't necessarily indicate happily-ever-after.

"Marital quality has multiple dimensions," says Claire Kamp Dush, lead author of the study and an assistant professor of human development and family science at Ohio State University. "The most important takeaway is there is a lot of stability in conflict. If you're finding it difficult to live with the level of conflict in your relationship before you get married, you probably shouldn't get married."

Knowing how much of a toll kids can take on a couple's marriage, experts have traditionally assumed that marital satisfaction resembles a U-shaped curve: it starts out high for newlyweds, declines once children arrive on the scene and creeps back up once the kids leave home.

But research over the last decade has showed that while marital bliss indeed declines post-kids, it doesn't appear to subsequently rebound. "It's not like your kids leaving is a magic potion for your marriage," says Kamp Dush.

MORE: Why Materialistic People Are Less Happy in Marriage

Relying on data collected from 2,000 married people from 1980 to 2000, researchers looked at the quality of a couple's marriage and how the couple related to one another. They identified three subgroups: low-conflict, which accounted for 16% of people; moderate-conflict, or 60% of participants; and high-conflict, which comprised 22% of the respondants. The groups largely stayed consistent over 20 years.

Then, researchers further classified the groups into four categories: volatile, validator, hostile and avoider. Here's how that broke down, according to the research, which was published online recently in the Journal of Family Issues:

Volatile: 20%, considered high-conflict and high- or mid-level happinessValidator: 54%, associated with low levels of divorce. This is the stereotypical "good marriage," marked by high- to mid-levels of happiness and moderate levels of conflict. Such couples often share in the decision-making and housework.Hostile: 20%, most likely to divorce. These couples report being unhappy, regardless of whether or not they argue.Avoider: 6%, considered low-conflict and high- or mid-happiness. These couples believe marriage should last forever and often hail from an era when husbands were not involved in housework.

Despite the unhelpful hubby, avoider couples are satisfied. Validators — the modern "happy couple" — are too.

MORE: Wealth Matters: People with Stuff Are More Likely to Marry

There's regular debate in the marriage literature about whether traditional or egalitarian marriages are better. Egalitarian marriages, Kamp points out, wouldn't be superior if the people involved are overly individualistic and thus less committed. But more traditional marriages where divorce is not an option — and arguing is repressed — may result in two very unhappy people.

In which group does your relationship fall? "Before you get married," says Kamp Dush, "you need to think about the level of conflict you can tolerate."

Bonnie Rochman is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @brochman. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Jumat, 21 Oktober 2011

Argue Much? Conflict Levels in Marriage Don't Change Over Time

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

If you squabble a lot with your sweetie, don't think that things will improve after getting hitched. New research shows that conflict levels don't vary much over the course of marriage. (The good news, conversely, is that if you get along well, you're likely to continue along that same trajectory.)

The new research by Ohio State University researchers also showed that satisfied marriages can take many forms. Just because a relationship isn't tranquil doesn't mean it's unhappy. Likewise, a marriage devoid of fighting doesn't necessarily indicate happily-ever-after.

"Marital quality has multiple dimensions," says Claire Kamp Dush, lead author of the study and an assistant professor of human development and family science at Ohio State University. "The most important takeaway is there is a lot of stability in conflict. If you're finding it difficult to live with the level of conflict in your relationship before you get married, you probably shouldn't get married."

Knowing how much of a toll kids can take on a couple's marriage, experts have traditionally assumed that marital satisfaction resembles a U-shaped curve: it starts out high for newlyweds, declines once children arrive on the scene and creeps back up once the kids leave home.

But research over the last decade has showed that while marital bliss indeed declines post-kids, it doesn't appear to subsequently rebound. "It's not like your kids leaving is a magic potion for your marriage," says Kamp Dush.

MORE: Why Materialistic People Are Less Happy in Marriage

Relying on data collected from 2,000 married people from 1980 to 2000, researchers looked at the quality of a couple's marriage and how the couple related to one another. They identified three subgroups: low-conflict, which accounted for 16% of people; moderate-conflict, or 60% of participants; and high-conflict, which comprised 22% of the respondants. The groups largely stayed consistent over 20 years.

Then, researchers further classified the groups into four categories: volatile, validator, hostile and avoider. Here's how that broke down, according to the research, which was published online recently in the Journal of Family Issues:

Volatile: 20%, considered high-conflict and high- or mid-level happinessValidator: 54%, associated with low levels of divorce. This is the stereotypical "good marriage," marked by high- to mid-levels of happiness and moderate levels of conflict. Such couples often share in the decision-making and housework.Hostile: 20%, most likely to divorce. These couples report being unhappy, regardless of whether or not they argue.Avoider: 6%, considered low-conflict and high- or mid-happiness. These couples believe marriage should last forever and often hail from an era when husbands were not involved in housework.

Despite the unhelpful hubby, avoider couples are satisfied. Validators — the modern "happy couple" — are too.

MORE: Wealth Matters: People with Stuff Are More Likely to Marry

There's regular debate in the marriage literature about whether traditional or egalitarian marriages are better. Egalitarian marriages, Kamp points out, wouldn't be superior if the people involved are overly individualistic and thus less committed. But more traditional marriages where divorce is not an option — and arguing is repressed — may result in two very unhappy people.

In which group does your relationship fall? "Before you get married," says Kamp Dush, "you need to think about the level of conflict you can tolerate."

Bonnie Rochman is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @brochman. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

IQ 'can change in teenage years'

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
19 October 2011 Last updated at 17:05 GMT By David Shukman Environment & science correspondent, BBC News Pupils taking exams Intellectual performance can both improve and deteriorate in adolescence The mental ability of teenagers can improve or decline on a far greater scale than previously thought, according to new research.

Until now the assumption has been that intellectual capacity, as measured by IQ, stays quite static during life.

But tests conducted on teenagers at an average age of 14 and then repeated when their average age was nearly 18 found improvements - and deterioration.

The findings are published in the journal Nature.

They have implications for how pupils are assessed, and the age at which decisions about their futures are made.

This study involved 19 boys and 14 girls, all undergoing a combination of brain scans and verbal and non-verbal IQ tests in 2004 and then in 2008.

The results show that a change in verbal IQ was found in 39% of the teenagers, with 21% showing a change in "performance IQ" - a test of spatial reasoning.

The findings are seen to have greater validity because for the first time the variations in IQ correlated with changes in two particular areas of the teenagers' brains.

An increase in verbal IQ corresponded with a growth in the density of part of the left motor cortex - a region activated during speech.

And an increase in non-verbal IQ correlated with a rise in the density of the anterior cerebellum - an area associated with movements of the hand.

The work was led by Professor Cathy Price of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at University College London and is published in the journal Nature.

The paper suggests that the results could be "encouraging to those whose intellectual potential may improve and… a warning that early achievers may not maintain their potential".

Professor Cathy Price explains how teenage brains and IQs can change over time

Professor Price said: "We have a tendency to assess children and determine the course of their education relatively early in life.

"But here we have shown that their intelligence is likely to be still developing.

"We have to be careful not to write off poorer performers at an early age when in fact their IQ may improve significantly given a few more years."

The research did not seek to understand the causes of the changes.

One explanation is that teenagers mature at relatively different ages - with "early" and "late" developers - while relative standards in education may play a part too.

One of the participants, Sebastian Friston, now aged 23, recorded a marked increase in IQ between the two tests - from average to one of the highest categories.

Educated in the state sector, he told me he had struggled in his early years, needing remedial maths tuition, but is now planning a doctorate in computer engineering.

"I think the change came in school I started doing subjects that really interested me, that I was engaged in, then I found it easier and far more interesting."

The research was funded by the Wellcome Trust, one of many projects supported under its programme of Understanding the Brain.

Future work may focus on how adaptable the brain may be beyond teenage years, and the implications for tackling mental diseases and other neurological conditions.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Jumat, 16 September 2011

HEALTH MANAGEMENT. Al Gore's '24 Hours' On Climate Change

Former Vice President Al Gore trains a group of presenters for the 24 Hours of Reality project. The online program will stream live online from 24 locations worldwide. Enlarge Courtesy of the Climate Reality Project
Former Vice President Al Gore trains a group of presenters for the 24 Hours of Reality project. The online program will stream live online from 24 locations worldwide.
Former Vice President Al Gore trains a group of presenters for the 24 Hours of Reality project. The online program will stream live online from 24 locations worldwide. Courtesy of the Climate Reality Project Former Vice President Al Gore trains a group of presenters for the 24 Hours of Reality project. The online program will stream live online from 24 locations worldwide.
Former Vice President Al Gore has spent much of the last decade on advocacy for environmental issues. He won an Oscar for his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth. In 2007, he received the Nobel Peace Prize along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Gore kicks off a new project today designed to increase awareness around the issue of climate change. 24 Hours of Reality, a 24-hour live online event, will offer local perspectives on the impact of climate change from 24 locations around the world.
In the years since An Inconvenient Truth, polls show the American public has become increasingly skeptical about whether humans are the cause of rising global temperatures. Gore hopes that the overwhelming scientific consensus around climate change will help convince skeptics that it is prudent to respond.
"If 98 doctors told you you had a heart condition that required you to make some changes and two doctors say, 'Don't worry about it,' ... hopefully you'd go with the 98," Gore tells NPR's Neal Conan. "That's the condition we're in now."
Gore also argues that many companies and individuals are making positive changes, purely on economic grounds. "There are a great many people and businesses that don't care to engage in discussion or debate about climate science who are going ahead right now to become more efficient — cut their emissions, cut their costs — and in the process they're becoming more profitable, most often."
The former vice president is also hopeful that there will come a time when what he considers the sheer evidence of climate change, like extreme weather events, will help penetrate resistance. "I saw this as a child growing up ... in the American South during the civil rights revolution," he says, "where individuals who were so resistant [to] eliminating the laws justifying discrimination did actually change when they really looked deeply into their own hearts and confronted the reality of the situation."
Climate scientists themselves have often not helped their own cause, Gore concedes. While he lauds skilled science communicators like the late Carl Sagan and Bill Nye "The Science Guy," "by and large, scientists often do not feel comfortable playing that role ... many of them are not comfortable in the political process of conducting a political dialogue," he says. "The more engaging and charismatic and personable scientists can get involved in telling the world about what they are finding, the better."

Rabu, 14 September 2011

HEALTH MANAGEMENT. Change the trans fat labelling recommended by experts

Not all trans fats are the same and it is time for nutrition labels according to this reality, says a University of Alberta-nutrition expert.
After a scientific evaluation carried out by Spencer Proctor, Canadian and international colleagues natural trans fats from ruminant animals such as dairy produced and cattle are not harmful to health. In fact, they show significant positive health effects and some evidence left also this natural trans fats to lower risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer.
A different fatty acid profile as industrial trans fatty acids has naturally occurring after the review, trans fat, what its different physiological effects. Ruminant trans fat is naturally occurring and meat and dairy products, while industrial trans fatty acids is a component of partially hydrogenated vegetable oils have been strongly associated with cholesterol and coronary heart disease.
Consumers are on a regular basis about what she should and do not eat bombed. The primary goal to avoid what is often fat and trans fats in particular have a negative reputation.
"A change in the appearance of trans fat information on nutritional information would be a big step forward," says Proctor, a researcher in the Department of agriculture, food and nutrition, is Director of the metabolic and heart circulation diseases lab at the U A. "right now, in Canada and the United States, a significant part of the natural trans fats, the content in the diet name trans fats calculation is included, which is misleading for the consumer." "We need reflect a reset in our approach, what tells us the new science."
Spencer adds that natural trans-fatty acids in the nutrition label calculation is not included in some European countries. Another approach might be separate entries for industrial trans fats and natural trans fats have.
Researchers evaluated an evidence from numerous studies in the review. On the basis of the promising results so far are plans for new studies, continue to study the health effects of the natural ruminant of derived trans fats dynamics.
A leading scientific program under the direction of Proctor was recently one million US dollar research funding from the Alberta livestock and meat agency this line of study in the next few years further approved.
"With industry, the science, regulatory authorities and other major groups in this area work together we can continue to steps up out to public better understand the health effects of the natural ruminant trans fats, to help", says Proctor.