We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Weight. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Weight. Tampilkan semua postingan

Rabu, 09 November 2011

After dieting, hormone changes may fuel weight regain

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
"Maintenance of weight loss requires continued vigilance and conscious effort to resist hunger," lead researcher says.Hunger-related hormones can remain at altered levels for at least a yearA drop in body fat percentage causes a decrease in the levels of certain hormones Finding an appetite suppressant of this sort is the next logical step in research

(Health.com) -- Losing weight is hard, but keeping the pounds off can be even harder.

By some estimates, as many as 80% of overweight people who manage to slim down noticeably after a diet gain some or all of the weight back within one year.

A shortage of willpower may not be the only reason for this rebound weight gain. According to a new study in the New England Journal of Medicine, hunger-related hormones disrupted by dieting and weight loss can remain at altered levels for at least a year, fueling a heartier-than-normal appetite and thwarting the best intentions of dieters.

"Maintaining weight loss may be more difficult than losing weight," says lead researcher Joseph Proietto, Ph.D., a professor of medicine at the University of Melbourne's Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, in Victoria, Australia. "This may be due to biological changes rather than [a] voluntary return to old habits."

Health.com: Diet-busting foods you should never eat

Scientists have known for years that hormones found in the gut, pancreas, and fatty tissue strongly influence body weight and processes such as hunger and calorie burning. And the reverse is also true: A drop in body fat percentage, for instance, causes a decrease in the levels of certain hormones (such as leptin, which signals to your brain when you're full) and an increase in others (such as ghrelin, which stimulates hunger).

What wasn't so well known, until now, was whether these changes in hormone levels persist after an individual loses weight. To find out, Proietto and his colleagues put 50 overweight or obese men and women on a very low-calorie diet for 10 weeks, then tracked their hormone levels for one year.

The average weight loss during the initial diet period was about 30 pounds, which for most of the participants represented at least 10% of their starting body weight. (Seven people who did not meet this target were dismissed from the study.) Blood tests showed that average levels of several hormones (including leptin, ghrelin, and insulin) had changed as a result of the weight loss. As expected, the participants also reported being hungrier -- both before and after breakfast -- than they had been at the study's start.

Health.com: 25 ways to cut 500 calories a day

At the 10-week mark the participants were allowed to resume a normal diet, but they continued to receive periodic advice from a dietitian and were also encouraged to get 30 minutes of exercise most days of the week. One year later, they'd regained about 12 pounds, on average, and follow-up tests showed that their hormone levels had only partially stabilized. Their hunger levels remained elevated as well.

The results aren't surprising, says Charles Burant, M.D., the director of the University of Michigan Nutrition Obesity Research Center, in Ann Arbor, who was not involved in the research. In fact, he says, the hormone changes seen in the study are a well-known evolutionary survival tactic.

"Multiple mechanisms have been developed, over eons of evolution, to get you to regain weight once you lose it...to tell your brain you're hungry and to ensure that you don't stop eating," he says. "If you don't have those drives, you wouldn't be alive."

Health.com: The best superfoods for weight loss

But now that we live in a world where calories are so easily consumed and physical exercise -- the best way to burn off those calories -- is largely unnecessary for day-to-day survival, these biological drives are backfiring and contributing to obesity, Burant says.

That's not to say that weight regain is inevitable, or that these drives can't be overcome through willpower. Although the hormone changes noted in the study are very real physical effects, Proietto says, personality and psychological factors may play a role in an individual's ability to manage chronic hunger.

"This may explain why some people maintain weight loss for longer than others," he says. "Maintenance of weight loss requires continued vigilance and conscious effort to resist hunger."

Promising research is being done to discover ways to restore hormone levels in people who lose weight, Burant says. Preliminary studies from Columbia University, for example, have found that when dieters are injected with replacement leptin hormones, it's easier for them to maintain or continue weight loss.

"When diabetics don't have enough insulin in their bodies, we give them back insulin in order to maintain their blood glucose," Burant says. Researchers should be finding a way to do the same for people who have lost weight, he adds, "whether it's with a drug, a dietary supplement, or certain nutrients—something that will stimulate the release of these hormones."

Proietto agrees that finding an appetite suppressant of this sort is the next logical step in hormone and obesity research. Until then, he says, weight-loss surgery is a possible option for some severely obese people who have not been able to keep weight off by other methods.

Copyright Health Magazine 2010



Education Information



Technology

Sabtu, 29 Oktober 2011

Why Dieters Can't Keep the Weight Off

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

As any dieter knows, losing weight is hard. Keeping it off can be even harder, and a small, new study by Australian researchers helps explain why: a symphony of hormonal changes sends the body relentless signals to slow metabolism and increase the urge to eat, for at least a year after weight loss.

The findings support obesity researchers' long-held belief that dieters who regain weight aren't just reverting back to old habits. Instead, they may be fighting their own biology.

Many previous studies have shown that when overweight people slim down, their bodies respond vigorously, by undergoing changes in hormones that affect hunger and satiety — "multiple compensatory mechanisms encouraging weight gain," as the authors put it. For instance, when obese people lose body fat, levels of the hormone leptin, which is produced by fat cells, drop. That signals to the brain that the body's energy stores are low, slowing metabolism and triggering hunger.

It's an evolutionary survival tactic. "These mechanisms would be advantageous for a lean person in an environment where food was scarce," write the authors, from the University of Melbourne and La Trobe University, in Australia, "but in an environment in which energy-dense food is abundant and physical activity is largely unnecessary, the high rate of relapse after weight loss is not surprising."

LIST: 5 Healthier Alternatives to the Potato Chip

What the new study adds to the picture is a longer view. By tracking participants for 16 months, the researchers found that these hormonal changes are persistent, possibly even permanent. The study involved 50 overweight or obese adults enrolled in an intense 10-week diet program. For the first eight weeks, the volunteers consumed just 500 to 550 calories a day. As a testament to how hard weight loss is, 11 participants dropped out during this early phase — they either quit or failed to lose the required 10% of body weight to continue.

Over the following two weeks, the 39 remaining participants, who had lost an average of 30 lbs. (14% of their initial body weight), were reintroduced to a normal diet and counseled on how to maintain their new weight. Over the next year, they were brought in every two months for follow-ups, contacted by phone between visits for dietary counseling and encouraged to exercise regularly. The researchers checked the participants' hormone levels at baseline, at the end of the diet phase, and then again one year later; they also asked about the dieters' subjective feelings of hunger. Before the year was up, five more participants had dropped out.

Despite the counseling, people gained back about 12 lbs. — nearly half of what they had lost — during the maintenance phase. And they reported feeling even hungrier at the end of the study than at the start. Their hormone profiles may help explain why.

Over the 10-week weight-loss phase, participants' levels of leptin plummeted by 65%. A year later they were still a third lower than before weight loss, having climbed as people regained fat. Levels of several other appetite-regulating hormones, including ghrelin and peptide YY, which are produced in the pancreas and gut, also remained significantly changed a year later, in ways that would increase hunger and spur the urge to eat.

MORE: Could Socializing Help Keep You Thin?

To many experts, the findings were not surprising. Weight loss is difficult — the study confirms it. But while compelling, the findings are limited by the study's small size and the lack of a control group; more rigorous research that compares hormone levels in dieters to those in overweight people who maintain their body size would be helpful. Also, the current study doesn't show whether hormonal changes caused the weight gain or coincided with it.

What is clear, however, is that obesity is not merely a problem of failed willpower or an unhealthy food environment. Solving it will require far better treatments than we've got now, perhaps including drugs that can balance dieters' hormones and restore normal appetite. "A combination of medications will probably be required," the authors write, although no such drug has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Of course, this is not to suggest that long-term weight loss is impossible. Many people have done it. But dieters "who have lost weight need to remain vigilant and understand that once they have lost weight the battle is not over," study author Joseph Proietto of the University of Melbourne told Bloomberg. "Indeed, the most difficult part of the weight loss program is the maintenance phase, which may be indefinite."

MORE: How Successful Dieters Make Weight Loss Stick

The study's essential finding is simple: prevention is key. "It's better not to gain weight than to try to lose it," Dr. George Bray of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, in Baton Rouge, La., told the AP.

The new study was published Thursday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Sora Song is the editor of TIME Healthland. Find her on Twitter at @sora_song. You can also continue the discussion on TIME Healthland's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIMEHealthland.



News



Debt Financing

Selasa, 25 Oktober 2011

Living near fast food joints may not up weight

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By Amy Norton

NEW YORK | Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:16pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Adults who live close to fast food restaurants may not weigh any more than the rest of us, a new study suggests.

The findings, from a 30-year study of Massachusetts adults, add to a conflicting body of research. A number of studies have suggested that people living in fast food-heavy neighborhoods have a higher rate of obesity, while a few have failed to find a link.

But most of those studies have had limitations -- like only studying people at one time point, making it impossible to tease out whether easy access to fast food could be blamed for the extra pounds.

In this latest study, researchers used data from more than 3,100 adults who entered a heart-health study back in 1971. And they found no consistent relationship between participants' driving distance to fast food joints and their weight over the next 30 years.

There was some evidence of a link among women. On average, for each kilometer (0.6 miles) women lived from the nearest fast food place, they showed a slightly lower body mass index (BMI).

The translation: A woman of average height would weigh about a pound less for every additional kilometer she lived away from a fast food place.

"It was a very small effect," said lead researcher Dr. Jason P. Block, of Harvard Medical School in Boston.

"We interpret that as being not a very important association," Block told Reuters Health.

That is not to say that people's neighborhoods do not matter when it comes to health, Block said.

But, he added, the findings suggest that fast access to unhealthy food is not the key issue in the battle of bulge. "Maybe proximity is not the thing we should be focusing on," Block said.

It may be more important to look at why people make the choices they do at restaurants, grocery stores and other food places, according to Block. In theory, he noted, "you can make healthful choices wherever you go."

The findings, reported in the American Journal of Epidemiology, are based on 3,113 Massachusetts adults who enrolled in the study in 1971, when they were about 38 years old, on average.

Over the next 30 years, the participants were interviewed and had physical exams seven times.

Block's team collected information on all restaurants, grocery stores and other food outlets in the region over that time period. Then they calculated the study participants' driving distance from home to the nearest restaurant or store.

With that level of detail, and the long-term follow-up, the study "makes a significant contribution," said Lisa M. Powell, a senior research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Powell, who was not involved in the research, has studied the relationship between neighborhood food options and people's weight.

And the current findings do not mean that neighborhood food options are unimportant -- especially for lower-income Americans, according to Powell.

In their own research, Powell and her colleagues have found that while there is no link between neighborhood food options and BMI overall, the picture was different in low-income areas. For low-income families, having a good-quality grocery store nearby -- rather than relying on convenience stores, for example -- may make a difference in weight.

If a higher-income person doesn't live close to a supermarket, Powell noted, he or she can probably drive to one fairly easily. For a low-income person, who would possibly be relying on public transportation, distance from quality food options could be a big obstacle.

The current study lacked data on people's incomes, so it wasn't possible to break the findings down that way.

And when it comes to fast food places, specifically, Block pointed out that they are now "ubiquitous." So the relative proximity of your house to the nearest McDonald's may simply not be a big deal.

Both Powell and Block noted that the interplay between people's environment, their personal behavior and their weight is complicated.

So the research questions go on. For Block's team, the next question is whether driving by fast food temptations on your way to and from work is related to the number on your bathroom scale.

SOURCE: bit.ly/t955fW American Journal of Epidemiology, online September 30, 2011.



New Automobile



Health Management

It's never too late to lose weight, study hints

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By Genevra Pittman

NEW YORK | Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:16pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Teens who are overweight or obese have higher chances of dying from heart disease down the line, but that extra risk virtually vanishes if they shed the spare pounds as adults.

That's according to a new study that tracked almost 19,000 men starting at age 18 -- when all of them were Harvard University undergrads -- for more than half a century on average.

"We have lots of data showing that if you are obese in middle age, it increases your risk of dying," said I-Min Lee from Harvard Medical School in Boston, who worked on the study.

"What we have less data on is, what if you're heavy when you're younger? How does that impact your health later on?"

The findings, Lee said, show that it's important to keep extra weight off in the first place -- but if young adults are overweight, they can lower their future heart risks by slimming down.

The data came from Harvard students who had a routine medical exam, which included measurements of height and weight, when they started college between 1916 and 1950.

In the 1960's, researchers followed up with 18,995 of the men and again asked about their height and weight, as well as other lifestyle habits and medical issues that could affect their risk of heart disease. At the time of those second surveys, the men were 46 years old on average.

For the current study, a new group of researchers collected participants' death certificates and determined that over 56 years from their first medical exams, about 11 percent of the men died from heart disease.

It turned out that being heavy at both the early and mid-life health checks increased the risk of ultimately dying from heart disease.

Obese young men had almost double the risk of their slimmer peers for heart disease death. Compared to normal-weight Harvard alumni, middle-aged men were 25 percent more likely to die of heart disease if they were overweight and 60 percent more likely if they were obese.

Those links held up when Lee and her colleagues took into account men's other heart disease risks, including high blood pressure, smoking and lack of physical activity.

However, the extra heart risk that came with being overweight and obese early in life disappeared in men who were no longer heavy at their follow-up health assessment, the researchers reported this week in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Often, "obese young adults become obese middle-aged adults," Lee told Reuters Health.

"However, if you're able to lose that weight, once you get to normal weight in middle age... the excess risk you had as a youngster goes away."

Even people who are heavy in their 50s and 60s can ease their future heart risks by losing weight, Lee added.

Stephen Kritchevsky, who has studied weight loss in older adults at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, agreed.

"The number of years being fat isn't as important as being overweight at middle age," he told Reuters Health. "At least through middle age, regardless of your life history, it is likely to be helpful to your health to try to lose weight."

Lee's team noted that the findings might not apply to women, since they weren't included in the study. Another limitation is that the study didn't distinguish where on their bodies different men carried their fat, which may affect the risk of heart disease.

Still, Kritchevsky, who wasn't involved in the new study, said the findings are "good news" for both the young and old.

"For younger overweight people, it suggests that if you address that, it will pay off," he concluded. For that group, "it's not too early to address it, and for middle-aged people, it's not too late."

SOURCE: bit.ly/tmd85w Archives of Internal Medicine, online October 24, 2011.



New Automobile



Health Management

Minggu, 23 Oktober 2011

How Successful Dieters Make Weight Loss Stick

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Dieters always regain lost weight, right? Not so, according to a new analysis of data from the National Weight Control Registry (NWCR), whose 10,000 participants have lost at least 30 lbs. and kept the weight off for a year or longer.

The new study, which was presented at the annual scientific meeting of the Obesity Society in Orlando, Fla., earlier this month, included data on a subset of NWCR members: about 3,000 men and women who managed to maintain the bulk of their weight loss for at least 10 years. These successful losers tended to be women and to have a college education. On average, they weighed 224 lbs. to start and lost 69 lbs.

MORE: How to Make a Healthy Diet More Affordable

Based on answers to questionnaires that all participants filled out yearly, researchers found that weight regain mostly happened early on, shortly after the initial weight loss. Over time, weight gain slowed. At five years, participants had regained about 17 lbs. By the end of the 10-year follow-up, participants had gained one more pound on average — managing, in the end, to keep off 51 lbs.

So how did they do it? Reported USA Today, NWCR members share these techniques:

Track their food intakeCount calorie or fat grams or use a commercial weight-loss program to track food intakeFollow a low-calorie, low-fat diet. They take in about 1,800 calories a day and less than 30% of calories from fat.Eat breakfast regularlyLimit the amount they eat out. They dine out an average of three times a week and eat fast food less than once a week.Eat similar foods regularly and don't splurge much on holidays and special occasionsWalk about an hour a day or burn the same calories with other activitiesWatch fewer than 10 hours of TV a weekWeigh themselves at least once a week

Common sense would suggest that these behaviors would help most people control their weight. But it's hard to say that definitively, considering that the NWCR includes a self-selected group of people who are likely more driven and more committed to losing weight and keeping it off, compared with your average Joe. These are folks who had the stick-to-itiveness to fill out surveys every year, stay on a diet and exercise regimen over the long term, and resist temptations to splurge — even on holidays.

MORE: Nobody Orders Fast-Food Salads, But That's Not the Real Problem

Still, despite the study's limitations, the registry's success stories may offer real inspiration for would-be dieters. "People do want to hear that there is hope, and it is possible to keep weight off without having to take extreme measures," Dr. Robert Kushner, a professor of medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, told ABC News. "Most people are discouraged. The behaviors listed by the NWCR are reasonable, practical and consistent with healthy living."

Meredith Melnick is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @MeredithCM. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Sabtu, 22 Oktober 2011

How Successful Dieters Make Weight Loss Stick

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Dieters always regain lost weight, right? Not so, according to a new analysis of data from the National Weight Control Registry (NWCR), whose 10,000 participants have lost at least 30 lbs. and kept the weight off for a year or longer.

The new study, which was presented at the annual scientific meeting of the Obesity Society in Orlando, Fla., earlier this month, included data on a subset of NWCR members: about 3,000 men and women who managed to maintain the bulk of their weight loss for at least 10 years. These successful losers tended to be women and to have a college education. On average, they weighed 224 lbs. to start and lost 69 lbs.

MORE: How to Make a Healthy Diet More Affordable

Based on answers to questionnaires that all participants filled out yearly, researchers found that weight regain mostly happened early on, shortly after the initial weight loss. Over time, weight gain slowed. At five years, participants had regained about 17 lbs. By the end of the 10-year follow-up, participants had gained one more pound on average — managing, in the end, to keep off 51 lbs.

So how did they do it? Reported USA Today, NWCR members share these techniques:

Track their food intakeCount calorie or fat grams or use a commercial weight-loss program to track food intakeFollow a low-calorie, low-fat diet. They take in about 1,800 calories a day and less than 30% of calories from fat.Eat breakfast regularlyLimit the amount they eat out. They dine out an average of three times a week and eat fast food less than once a week.Eat similar foods regularly and don't splurge much on holidays and special occasionsWalk about an hour a day or burn the same calories with other activitiesWatch fewer than 10 hours of TV a weekWeigh themselves at least once a week

Common sense would suggest that these behaviors would help most people control their weight. But it's hard to say that definitively, considering that the NWCR includes a self-selected group of people who are likely more driven and more committed to losing weight and keeping it off, compared with your average Joe. These are folks who had the stick-to-itiveness to fill out surveys every year, stay on a diet and exercise regimen over the long term, and resist temptations to splurge — even on holidays.

MORE: Nobody Orders Fast-Food Salads, But That's Not the Real Problem

Still, despite the study's limitations, the registry's success stories may offer real inspiration for would-be dieters. "People do want to hear that there is hope, and it is possible to keep weight off without having to take extreme measures," Dr. Robert Kushner, a professor of medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, told ABC News. "Most people are discouraged. The behaviors listed by the NWCR are reasonable, practical and consistent with healthy living."

Meredith Melnick is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @MeredithCM. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Jumat, 14 Oktober 2011

Weight loss bypass surgery may muffle temptation

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By Rob Goodier

NEW YORK | Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:15pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who've had gastric bypass surgery might make healthier eating choices than those who opt for the weight loss procedure known as gastric banding, say UK researchers who found bypass patients less tempted by sweets and other fattening foods.

After surveying patients who had either type of surgery, and performing brain scans on several dozen of them, Dr. Tony Goldstone of Imperial College London and Hammersmith Hospital and his colleagues found that even deep down in their brains, the gastric bypass patients seemed to like high-calorie foods less.

"The results suggest that gastric-banding patients had to exert quite a lot of self-control over their eating behavior. Banding patients also had higher concern about their weight," Goldstone told Reuters Health.

In contrast, gastric bypass patients "don't feel they have to exert as much cognitive control over what they're eating," said Goldstone, who presented the findings October 4th at the Obesity Society's annual meeting in Orlando, Florida.

The two weight loss operations have similar broad goals -- to shrink the stomach so people feel full with less food. In gastric bypass, the stomach is surgically reduced and one end of it is rerouted to bypass part of the small intestine. With gastric banding, a silicone band placed around the top of the stomach reduces its capacity.

Although gastric banding is more popular, in part because the band can be removed, previous research has found gastric bypass patients seem to lose more weight and lose it faster than banding patients. The reasons for the differences are still unclear.

Goldstone's team studied 30 gastric bypass patients, 28 gastric banding patients and 20 people who did not have weight loss surgery. All the participants started out obese and the two surgery groups had lost similar amounts of body weight since their respective procedures, an average of 28 percent.

Since banding patients lose weight more slowly, those in this study had undergone their procedure an average of 18 months earlier, compared to the bypass patients at 10 months post-surgery.

Participants filled out an eating behavior questionnaire, and 20 people in each group underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while looking at pictures of food.

Among the significant differences in questionnaire responses, researchers found, the gastric bypass patients reported having to restrain themselves less, or finding it easier to restrain themselves from eating poorly. They also did less impulsive eating -- eating something on sight, not out of hunger -- and less eating to boost their mood, or "emotional eating."

Those who underwent fMRI had fasted overnight, and then viewed pictures of foods and ate ice cream during the brain scan. The gastric bypass patients rated the ice cream and pictures of high-calorie foods as less appealing than did the gastric banding patients.

Bypass patients also showed lower activity in brain areas like the orbitofrontal cortex (associated with a reward response), the amygdala (associated with emotion) and in the ventral striatum (which would register the expectation of a reward like food).

Goldstone theorizes that gut hormones that trigger a feeling of fullness after eating are released more quickly in gastric bypass patients, and these chemical signals may be influencing those patients' long- and short-term responses to food in a way the gastric banding patients don't experience.

"The connections between the biology of obesity and the mechanisms of the surgery we use is really a new science established in the last three to five years," said Dr. Robin Blackstone, president of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, who was not involved in the study. "Now that we understand more about how these procedures are working, it makes sense that the bypass patients would have more control. The band would not produce those same effects."

"Bypass results in more weight loss than the band and it is a more sustainable weight loss," Blackstone added. "Now we begin to understand why that is, because it has these kinds of effects."

It's not possible yet to say that one type of surgery or another is better for a certain type of patient, noted Blackstone, who is also the medical director at Scottsdale Healthcare Bariatric Center in Arizona.

"A lot of people are working to figure out which procedure is best for which patients," she said.

"People that are motivated to use the band generally don't have much weight to lose, or they're attracted by the safety profile -- the lower mortality rates -- and that it's reversible," Blackstone said.

"The more we begin to understand about patients individually, including the genetic components of their obesity, we'll be able to match a procedure really well for them. We just don't know how to select people out for each procedure," she said.

Goldstone said his next step will be determining whether the reduced response to fattening foods seen in gastric bypass patients actually translates into their making healthier, low-calorie food choices.



New Automobile



Health Management

Sabtu, 08 Oktober 2011

Weight loss plan 'lacks evidence'

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
6 October 2011 Last updated at 02:56 GMT By Helen Briggs Health editor, BBC News website Food Can you lose weight by changing your mindset? 'Nudging' people to lose weight by thinking about their lifestyle shows little evidence of success, an analysis of published data suggests.

It showed the step-by-step behavioural approach used in hospitals and clinics led to an average weight loss of 2kg (4.4lb) or less.

The report, by The Cochrane Library, looked at studies involving nearly 4,000 people around the world.

A nutritionist said changing one's mindset was not enough.

The method, known as the transtheoretical model stages of change, is used to encourage people to move towards more healthy forms of behaviour.

Continue reading the main story
Changing one's mindset is not enough. People need to eat less and exercise more to lose weight”

End Quote Spokesperson British Nutrition Foundation The five-step process encourages people to see the need to change and then give it a go.

It has been shown to be successful in helping people quit smoking, and has also been used in alcohol and drug addiction.

The analysis looked at five trials - in the UK, US, Netherlands, Canada, and Australia - involving 1,834 overweight or obese patients, and 2,076 people of normal weight.

The authors, led by Prof Azeem Majeed and Dr Nik Tuah of Imperial College London, found no convincing evidence of any sustained or significant weight loss.

Prof Majeed told the BBC: "Changing people's dietary patterns is very difficult - that's why we've got such a problem with obesity."

Dr Tuah added: "This review does not necessarily challenge the notion that diet and exercise are effective weight loss strategies, but instead raises questions about how to approach lifestyle changes for individuals who want to adopt them."

A spokesperson for the charity, the British Nutritional Foundation, said the report emphasised the need to take concerted action when trying to lose weight.

She said: "Changing one's mindset is not enough. People need to eat less and exercise more to lose weight."



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Kamis, 06 Oktober 2011

Weight loss plan 'lacks evidence'

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
6 October 2011 Last updated at 02:56 GMT By Helen Briggs Health editor, BBC News website Food Can you lose weight by changing your mindset? 'Nudging' people to lose weight by thinking about their lifestyle shows little evidence of success, an analysis of published data suggests.

It showed the step-by-step behavioural approach used in hospitals and clinics led to an average weight loss of 2kg or less.

The report, by The Cochrane Library, looked at studies involving nearly 4,000 people around the world.

A nutritionist said changing one's mindset was not enough.

The method, known as the transtheoretical model stages of change, is used to encourage people to move towards more healthy forms of behaviour.

Continue reading the main story
Changing one's mindset is not enough. People need to eat less and exercise more to lose weight”

End Quote Spokesperson British Nutrition Foundation The five-step process encourages people to see the need to change and then give it a go.

It has been shown to be successful in helping people quit smoking, and has also been used in alcohol and drug addiction.

The analysis looked at five trials - in the UK, US, Netherlands, Canada, and Australia - involving 1,834 overweight or obese patients, and 2,076 people of normal weight.

The authors, led by Professor Azeem Majeed and Dr Nik Tuah of Imperial College London, found no convincing evidence of any sustained or significant weight loss.

Professor Majeed told the BBC: "Changing people's dietary patterns is very difficult - that's why we've got such a problem with obesity."

Dr Tuah added: "This review does not necessarily challenge the notion that diet and exercise are effective weight loss strategies, but instead raises questions about how to approach lifestyle changes for individuals who want to adopt them."

A spokesperson for the charity, the British Nutritional Foundation, said the report emphasised the need to take concerted action when trying to lose weight.

She said: "Changing one's mindset is not enough. People need to eat less and exercise more to lose weight."



Debt Financing



Career Advisor