We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

We give you many useful information about health

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Pregnant. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Pregnant. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 25 Oktober 2011

Using Beads to Get Pregnant — or Prevent It

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Women who want to get pregnant, as well as those who just as desperately desire the opposite outcome, care a lot about their fertility. But figuring out exactly when to have sex — or when to avoid it — can be tricky.

Using some form of birth control can do the trick, of course, but not all women choose to do so. In theory, natural family planning — knowing when you ovulate to figure out when to have sex — can be useful too. Yet it's undeniable that more than a few babies (two girls belonging to this author, in fact) have made their way into this world courtesy of mothers who flubbed that calculation.

Now a new study in the October issue of the Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care finds that a fertility-awareness-based method of family planning developed by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) actually works so well for those women who have a pretty regular menstrual cycle that they continued to use it successfully for years.

MORE: Teen Sex Update: Fewer Teens Doing It, More Boys Using Condoms

The Standard Days Method (SDM) zeroes in on the 12-day "fertile window" of a woman's menstrual cycle. The window accounts for the life span of the woman's egg — about 24 hours after ovulation — and the five days that sperm remain viable after ejaculation, while allowing for variation between cycles. In the study, which followed 1,659 women who used the method, those who relied on it in the first year were likely to have continued success using it in years two and three.

In 2002, different research found that the SDM was more than 95% effective at avoiding pregnancy, a rate that trumps the effectiveness of other birth-control methods such as the diaphragm or condoms.

It's unclear what separates the SDM from the more commonly known rhythm method, and perhaps that confusion is part of the reason why natural family planning isn't more popular. "If you asked 20 people what the rhythm method is, you get 20 different answers," says Institute for Reproductive Health Director Victoria Jennings, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Georgetown. "No one I know actually used the rhythm method partly because it's never been well-tested for efficacy. People tend to not want to risk that."

Call it what you want, the concept underlying fertility-awareness birth-control methods is this: a woman ovulates near the middle of her cycle, so she is potentially fertile around that time for several days; adjust the timing of unprotected sex accordingly.

MORE: How the Pill Affects Sexual Satisfaction, Lasting Marriage

What might contribute to SDM's success is CycleBeads, a bunch of beads strung on a necklace. Developed at Georgetown, the necklace contains 32 color-coded beads with each bead representing a day of the menstrual cycle. A red bead indicates the first day of a woman's period; brown beads symbolize days when pregnancy is very unlikely, and glow-in-the dark white beads (beads 8 to 19) signal fertile days. Each day, a woman moves a black rubber ring ahead by one bead to indicate where she is in her cycle.

"It isn't like it's this totally radical new concept that no one has ever thought of before, but we have put it into a context that real people can actually use," says Jennings.

CycleBeads, which costs about $10, does the heavy lifting of figuring out when pregnancy is most likely to occur, says Jennings. "Women need to do math, calculating each cycle and coming up with the days in the current cycle in which she is likely to get pregnant," says Jennings. "In the Standard Days Method, the calculations have essentially been done for her."

Women with cycles lasting 26 to 32 days are considered fertile between days 8 and 19. "That gives her a bit of leeway to sometimes ovulate a bit later or a bit earlier and takes into account the life span of egg and sperm," says Jennings.

One fringe benefit of the beads is enhanced communication between romantic partners. Picture a woman using CycleBeads to demonstrate to her lover where she is in her cycle. "It's a good tool so they can decide together if they do want to get pregnant, these are the days. Or if they don't want to get pregnant, they can use the beads to decide when to use condoms."

CycleBeads are available online, at Whole Foods and in 40 different countries. Lest you bemoan the low-techness of the method, there's also an app available called "icyclebeads."

Bonnie Rochman is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @brochman. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Senin, 24 Oktober 2011

BPA Exposure in Pregnant Women May Affect Daughters' Behavior

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

A new study finds that exposure to bisphenol A before birth may lead to behavior problems in girls by age 3. The findings, published in Pediatrics, promise to heat up the debate over the safety of BPA, the ubiquitous chemical found in water bottles, linings of cans and even on the register receipts we get at the checkout stand.

Led by Joe Braun, a research fellow at the Harvard School of Public Health, the study suggests that exposure to BPA, especially in developing fetuses, may be long-lasting. Among a group of 244 mothers and their 3-year-olds whose BPA levels were measured in their urine, moms who had higher BPA levels during pregnancy were more likely to have children who were aggressive, anxious and hyperactive and showed poor emotional control, compared with moms with lower levels of BPA. The children's own BPA levels did not have an effect on their behavior patterns.

MORE: Pregnant Women Awash in Chemicals. Is That Bad for Baby?

The results highlight how important the pregnancy period is to early brain development, and suggest that there are critical windows during which exposure to chemicals like BPA can perhaps permanently influence a child's emotional and behavioral state. "It's possible that the brain is more vulnerable to the effects of BPA during certain parts of pregnancy, such as the early stages, and not as vulnerable later," says Braun. "Certain events take place in the brain, and once they take place, they are done."

Earlier studies in animals have linked BPA exposure in the womb to aggressive and anxious behavior among offspring, and studies in young children have linked the chemical to asthma.

The scientists tested pregnant women for BPA at 16 and 26 weeks gestation and at birth. Their children were tested annually until age 3. About 97% of the moms and children showed some BPA in their urine, confirming previous data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which show that nearly all Americans have a measurable amount of the chemical in their systems.

SPECIAL: The Perils of Plastic

The results held strong even after the researchers adjusted for other possible contributors to the children's behavior, such as breast-feeding, mother's education, depression and marital status, and possible study confounders such as differences in the strength of the urine samples. The results were the first to look at how BPA may affect executive functions of the brain, which regulate reasoning and planning as well as control of emotions. For every 10-fold increase in the mothers' gestational BPA concentrations, the children showed a 9-to-12-point increase in impulsivity and a lack of emotional control.

"The data suggest that at exposures that humans are typically exposed to, there seems to be an effect of BPA on behavior," says Braun.

The effect was more striking in girls than in boys, which hints at differences in the hormonal factors that may regulate development of executive and behavioral activities of the brain. Girls in the study were more than twice as likely as boys to show anxiety and depression if their mothers had been exposed to BPA. It's possible that BPA may be boosting levels of the hormone estradiol in female fetuses, disrupting the normal sexual differentiation of the brain, leading it to become more masculine. In animal studies, the female hormone estradiol has been shown to convert to testosterone in males, resulting in masculinization.

MORE: Even 'BPA-Free' Plastics Leach Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals

Braun says it's not exactly clear yet why BPA may affect girl and boys differently, but he is hoping to investigate these results further to find out. More studies will also reveal whether there is a threshold level of BPA that triggers these changes in fetal brain development.

In the meantime, how should an expectant mom reduce her exposure to BPA? The Food and Drug Administration stands by its claim that current use of the chemical in food packaging is safe, but Braun says moms-to-be may reduce their exposure by avoiding canned and packaged foods. Whether or not pregnant women should also avoid handling thermal register receipts is less clear; there's a study currently underway that is investigating whether day-to-day handling of these receipts can significantly increase exposure. "To be precautionary," Braun says, especially for those who work at registers, "it's reasonable to wear gloves."

MORE: Dirty Money: Traces of BPA Found on Currency

Alice Park is a writer at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @aliceparkny. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing

Jumat, 14 Oktober 2011

Study: Gulf Seafood Unsafe for Pregnant Women and Children?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
John Moore/Getty Images A worker shows off shrimp fresh from the Gulf of Mexico at a seafood retailer on May 18, 2010 in Port Sulfur, Louisiana.

Is Gulf seafood safe to eat? The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the green light following the BP oil spill that dumped nearly 5 million barrels of crude off the coast of Louisiana last year, but now an environmental watchdog group says the agency's standards are "based on outdated science" and underestimate the risk of cancer-causing contaminants to pregnant women and children eating seafood from the Gulf.

At issue are what the FDA considers safe levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), compounds found in oil, coal and gasoline that have been linked to cancer in animals and humans. According to Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, a researcher with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the FDA accepts 100 to 10,000 times more PAH contamination in seafood than the NRDC deems safe for vulnerable populations.

That conclusion was published online Wednesday in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. On the same day, the NRDC filed a petition [PDF] asking the FDA to reevaluate its science and set new limits for PAHs in seafood to ensure public safety, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women and children.

VIDEO: Lingering Worries About Health and Seafood in Louisiana

On her blog, Rotkin-Ellman noted "six major flaws" in the FDA's assessment of PAHs in Gulf seafood: "assuming everyone weighs 80 kg (176 lbs), underestimating how much seafood Gulf residents eat, ignoring the cancer risk from naphthalene [a common PAH] contamination, failing to address the increased vulnerability of pregnant women and children, allowing for a high level of cancer risk, and assuming that the contamination will only last five years."

Safe standards for PAH contamination, based on new calculations by Rotkin-Ellman and her team, were markedly different from what the FDA found. Wrote Rotkin-Ellman:

For example, FDA said that 123,000 micrograms of naphthalene per kilogram of shrimp was safe for everyone to eat. According to our calculations, only 5.91 micrograms should have been allowed to protect pregnant women and children who eat a lot of seafood. For comparison, our calculations show that 46.99 micrograms of naphthalene per kilogram of shellfish would be safe for an adult consumer.

According to our calculations, the risk of cancer associated with eating Gulf shellfish contaminated at the levels FDA says is safe could be as high as 20,000 in a million. Put another way, this means that if 1,000 pregnant women (and their children) ate Gulf seafood contaminated at the levels FDA said are safe, 20 of the children born to them would be at significant risk of cancer from the contamination.

The NRDC study found that up to 53% of shrimp tested had PAH levels exceeding the safe limits that the group had determined for pregnant women who eat a lot of Gulf shellfish. Rotkin-Ellman said her study did not find reason for concern for other adults.

MORE: How Safe is Gulf Seafood?

For its part, the FDA stands by its calculations and says that seafood fished from areas of the Gulf that have been reopened since the BP spill or were never closed is safe. Reported the Tallahassee Democrat:

The FDA said most of the seafood it sampled after the spill had no detectable trace of oil. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals calculated that every day for five years the average person could eat 1,575 jumbo shrimp or 130 oysters without health concerns.

"We're very confident that the steps that we have put in place to assure the safety of seafood have worked," FDA spokesman Doug Karas told the Democrat. "We put in an extensive program of sampling, at that time and since then, and the results have consistently been 100 to 1,000 times below our levels of concern."

MORE: FDA, NOAA Deem Gulf Seafood Safe

Meredith Melnick is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @MeredithCM. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.



News



Debt Financing